On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:38:05 -0400, Kevin Mckenzie wrote: >> DFHCFLS_SYSTCFD1 05/10/2008 22:45:55 ALLOCATED >> POLICY CHANGE PENDING - CHANGE > >What happens when you issue the command > >d xcf,str,strname="DFHCFLS_SYSTCFD1", > >and then try to delete the connections to the structure? Those are what >need to be cleaned up, the connections XCF thinks it has to the structure. > >You use the command > >setxcf force,connection,strname=<strname>,conname=<failedconnection> > >to do this. No, I stand by my previous statement that: setxcf force,structure,strname=DSNDSNY_SCA ...should do the trick for this specific case. That is the minimum thing that Cwi needs. If they managed to pend any other commands to XCF they may also need to issue a SETXCF POLICY,START,POLNM=....... command to move things forward. (We needed that for exactly that reason, too. YMMV.) -- Tom Schmidt (DB2 should then rebuild in the new structure in the new CF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
