On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:47:43 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >>As I stated, if columns 71-72 fall within a JCL symbol, the converter >>fails to substitute the symbol value. > >Your symbol was not continued in accordance with JCL rules; it ran past >column 71. > Thank you for not harping on my unfortunate typo in my example as a distraction.
IIRC, what I posted was copied from an SDSF JESJCL view. Indention introduced by the converter in formatting the listing caused that listing to extend beyond column 71. The original source was properly broken after column 71 with a continuation mark in 72. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
