In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/24/2008
at 08:56 AM, "William H. Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>First: What time period are you referring to, here?
1970's.
>Were you working for
>the US Government at the time to which you refer?
No. The facility with the seriously worn slugs was in Israel.
>Yep. You said it. IBM didn't want to sell one at all.
One a leased train wouldn't they be under contractual obligation to
replace the worn slugs at their[1] expense.
>Duh! So? It was such a popular HASP mod that the HASP
>newsletter printed examples of how to do it -- right.
Did the HASP newsletter suggest strong a modified UCS image under the name
of the stock image?
>You want me to go back now and make them change what
>they said?
No, but I'd like some evidence that they said it. It certainly doesn't
match my experience.
[1] Well, still your expense if you take the cost of the lease into
account.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
