On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 17:02 +0100, R.S. wrote: > Of course it is possible to use GDGs for cyclic jobs running hourly > (still over year) or even more frequently. [...] But I think it is > uncommon.
Commonplace here. We are heavy, regular users of GDGs. Lots and LOTS of old-master-in, transaction-file-in, new-master-out stuff. Lots of new generations that are subsequently aggregated. It's the technology that Would Not Die. -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
