> > Are you haevy user of GDGs created *more frequently* than daily?
We run a batch job to copy off smf and ims log data whenever a switch occurs. Just our kind of normal. > BTW: I think that a reason why IBM didn't increase maximum LIMIT() for > GDG is lack of interest: Those customers who needed it already use > "pseudo-GDG" (batch scheduler failities). > > Is there any other reason? No one wants 365 generations? > We learned to live with the limitation. Regards, John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
