David Andrews wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 17:02 +0100, R.S. wrote:
Of course it is possible to use GDGs for cyclic jobs running hourly
(still over year) or even more frequently. [...] But I think it is
uncommon.
Commonplace here. We are heavy, regular users of GDGs.
Are you haevy user of GDGs created *more frequently* than daily?
My opinion wasn't GDGs are not used, rather GDGs are usually created on
daily basis or less frequently.
BTW: I think that a reason why IBM didn't increase maximum LIMIT() for
GDG is lack of interest: Those customers who needed it already use
"pseudo-GDG" (batch scheduler failities).
Is there any other reason? No one wants 365 generations?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego,
nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2008 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA wynosi
118.642.672 złote i został w całości wpłacony.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
