Art, >I, too, have no choice - most company apps require ActiveX to work. After >years of unsuccessful protests, I finally gave up on home access and >acquired a company laptop. Let them deal with it. >So much for the Statement of Integrity ... I would have expected better ...
You're right, why should I care if the standard allows unsafe settings? I do because I hate the pop-ups and the page content that constantly moves. It is really irritating when I allow ActiveXs. But thanks for letting me know I am not the only one :-) Misery does love company. Oh, and did I mention that I opened a 'feedback ETR' against servicelink, that of course does not get shown via servicelink *at all*, that needs to be viewed via ssrprobl which is being sunset in mid-May, and the replacement called 'service request' terminates even earlier with IE? The other corporate browser, Opera, terminates without even telling me so when asked to display those 'new and improved' pages, or it shows me what looks like a java method traceback. So much for good programming practises! Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
