I work as a programmer in a small shop and we're pretty much on our
own when it comes to compile processes.  Over the years we've built
our own ISPF application to monitor source code and generate standard
compile JCL.  Since we have to "eat our own dog food" we have put a
lot of effort into making the processes programmer-friendly and
productive.

However, to achieve that we've sacrificed the rigor provided by
products like Endevor.  The in house tool kit does not guarantee
source code integrity from start to finish.  The programmer can easily
shoot himself in the foot by ignoring established procedures and
managing his code outside of the tool kit.

I have worked at an Endevor shop, and the programmers, almost to a man
(or woman), hated the process because it was not well suited to the
unit test code/compile/test loop.  Many used their own compile JCL for
their unit testing, not wanting to wrestle with Endevor until they
were obliged to.  While I was there I wrote a simple ISPF application
to generate compile JCL, and it was by far the most popular tool that
I created.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to