Who is responsible for updating the PROCs when new loadlibs are added? Who changes the invocation utilities to incorporate new or overridden options or other variables? Who decides the architectural requirements for the application and codes the overrides for those?
It's pretty clear that the app/dev teams own the application programs and systems owns the underlying functional tools (TSO/ISPF, ROSCOE, COBOL compiler libraries, etc). Thanks for all of the other responses. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 8:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Application Compiles Chuck Kreiter wrote Our IT department is having a debate about ownership of the compile process, PROC's and invocation utilities (REXX, CLIST, RPF's). I'd like to hear from some other sysprog types on who owns this process in your shop? Can you define what is meant by "ownership" ? ____________________________________________________________ Click to find the latest solutions to enhance your small business. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTI97vX3hnQJxjHdRZajPuY U7kmaGHwnwIsSS1LH44w6StSb6ELTJe/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
