On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:03:34 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:26:33 -0400, Thompson, Steve ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>... >>The picture and last laugh came from one who had been rebuffed for >>pointing out the confusion caused by using USS instead of OE or >>OMVS, or some such. >>... > >I admit I could not tell who got the last laugh and who or what >was being laughed at, but suspected I might be in the "laughed >at" catagory. I guess Chris felt that a bit more strongly than I did. >I think we were both wrong. > >And to show how deeply entrenched I am in the old (real :-) ) def >of USS, when I saw the subject I thought, Oh oh. I misused USS >once. I replaced the default IBMTEST with something that displayed >a whole buch of diagnostic stuff. > >And if nobody but Chris understands what I just said, well, that's >fine. > >Pat O'Keefe > I have no idea what you are talking about. Regards, IBMECHO ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
