I understand, Pat. You probably got a lot of confused callers when you came in Monday morning.
Ken Klein Sr. Systems Programmer Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance - Louisville [email protected] 502-495-5000 x7011 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: USS misuse (was Re: Mainframe hacking) On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:03:34 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:26:33 -0400, Thompson, Steve ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>... >>The picture and last laugh came from one who had been rebuffed for >>pointing out the confusion caused by using USS instead of OE or OMVS, >>or some such. >>... > >I admit I could not tell who got the last laugh and who or what was >being laughed at, but suspected I might be in the "laughed at" >catagory. I guess Chris felt that a bit more strongly than I did. >I think we were both wrong. > >And to show how deeply entrenched I am in the old (real :-) ) def of >USS, when I saw the subject I thought, Oh oh. I misused USS once. I >replaced the default IBMTEST with something that displayed a whole buch >of diagnostic stuff. > >And if nobody but Chris understands what I just said, well, that's >fine. > >Pat O'Keefe > I have no idea what you are talking about. Regards, IBMECHO ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
