GOFF could, I suppose, be described as a problem, perhaps even a severe one, for the Linkage Editor. The Linkage Editor does not support GOFF at all. For it you must use the Binder. Moreover, GOFF wots not of PDSs or load modules. Its use requires program objects resident in PDSEs.
Adjust what you are doing accordingly, and feel free to use the long[er] names that will be available to you. John Gilmore. Ashland, MA 01721 - USA On 8/20/12, Frank Swarbrick <[email protected]> wrote: > Upgrades. Why do you ask? > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Clark Morris <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 5:05 PM >>Subject: Re: GOFF >> >>On 20 Aug 2012 15:13:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >> >>>I am converting to assembler subroutines, which are called by (Enterprise) >>> COBOL programs to do various things, to make them re-entrant. Is there >>> any reason I should not change my assembler options to specify GOFF? >>> >>Are these brand new routines as opposed to upgrades of existing >>routines? >> >>Clark Morris >>> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
