On 20 Aug 2012 16:20:17 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Upgrades. Why do you ask? > If they are upgrades, review them to see if the latest and greatest COBOL can do the job. This can ease future maintenance. INSPECT CONVERTING and some of the other things in the 1985 standard eliminated the need for some routines. Also routines written in COBOL can be included as sub-programs saving inter-module overhead.
Clark Morris > > >>________________________________ >> From: Clark Morris <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 5:05 PM >>Subject: Re: GOFF >> >>On 20 Aug 2012 15:13:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >> >>>I am converting to assembler subroutines, which are called by (Enterprise) >>>COBOL programs to do various things, to make them re-entrant. Is there any >>>reason I should not change my assembler options to specify GOFF? >>> >>Are these brand new routines as opposed to upgrades of existing >>routines? >> >>Clark Morris >>> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> >> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
