In <[email protected]>, on
08/20/2012
at 07:57 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>There are contrary valid points of view here:
Perhaps on what is desirable, but the behavior of the ISPF code is a
matter of fact.
>o Not to require the programmer to provide resources he doesn't
> intend to use.
>o To require the programmer to supply in advance all resources
> he might potentially use, in order to preclude a failure later in
> the process.
>ISPF apparently elects the latter;
No.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
