On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Bob Shannon <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I prefer "exec" myself, but I believe a true "exec" should have been written
>in EXEC or EXEC 2 language, not Rexx. I find "a Rexx" to be awkward, but I'm
>not convinced that it's incorrect.
Right. "A Rexx" is actually analogous to "An EXEC" or "A CLIST", even though we
VMers find it grating. But arguably "A Rexx EXEC" is (as Bob suggests) the
anomaly.
I still likely won't start calling it "A Rexx" until well after they put me in
the Old Sysprogs Home... ("You had 16M? We had 256K! And we LOVED it! Only cost
a nickel...")
--
...phsiii
Phil Smith III
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Voltage Security, Inc.
www.voltage.com<http://www.voltage.com>
(703) 476-4511 (home office)
(703) 568-6662 (cell)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
