Phil, 
Worked VM since SP1, they were always execs to me. Scripts makes me think Nix, 
unix .

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com

On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Phil Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Bob Shannon <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> I prefer "exec" myself, but I believe a true "exec" should have been written 
>> in EXEC or EXEC 2 language, not Rexx. I find "a Rexx" to be awkward, but I'm 
>> not convinced that it's incorrect.
> 
> Right. "A Rexx" is actually analogous to "An EXEC" or "A CLIST", even though 
> we VMers find it grating. But arguably "A Rexx EXEC" is (as Bob suggests) the 
> anomaly.
> 
> I still likely won't start calling it "A Rexx" until well after they put me 
> in the Old Sysprogs Home... ("You had 16M? We had 256K! And we LOVED it! Only 
> cost a nickel...")
> --
> ...phsiii
> 
> Phil Smith III
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Voltage Security, Inc.
> www.voltage.com<http://www.voltage.com>
> (703) 476-4511 (home office)
> (703) 568-6662 (cell)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to