I am wondering if z/OS 2.x will bring 64 bit address constants into the operating system so everything can run above the 2GB bar.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > Shmuel says: > > | AMODE(64) is not appropriate for a module that is not executable. > > Peter Relson---I am now wary of paraphrasing him---appears to judge > that AMODE is moot for tables. I have said and say that AMODE(64) is > not just appropriate but desirable for a read-only module that > contains doubleword ADCONs. > > Take your pick; or consult an augur, who will to wield his lituus in > helping you make your choice. > > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
