Shmuel says: | AMODE(64) is not appropriate for a module that is not executable.
Peter Relson---I am now wary of paraphrasing him---appears to judge that AMODE is moot for tables. I have said and say that AMODE(64) is not just appropriate but desirable for a read-only module that contains doubleword ADCONs. Take your pick; or consult an augur, who will to wield his lituus in helping you make your choice. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
