In
<CAE1XxDEaMWA=aMTmU8QXhzzeLKfPVCJUqgV=w5ycfgn+vz9...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 12/06/2012
at 10:44 AM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>Let me therefore take full responsibility for that paraphrase myself.
> AMODE(64) seems to me to be the only appreopiate way to mark an
>object that is to be resident above the bar, and in particular, one
>that while refreshable contains metadata, relocatable doubleword
>pointers to locations within itself.
AMODE(64) is not appropriate for a module that is not executable.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
