Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >>Question: what was the PGM and parms used in that dummy job?
>Irrelevant; the job didn't have to actually run. What I saw most often was >START X, where there was no proc named X and the start would fail. Perhaps irrelevant and more irrelevant these days, but why was IBM distributing the proc DEALLOC (renamed by some sites to X) in the first place? If the proc does not exist (ie no member found) in those days, are the allocation/de-allocation processes still driven or not? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
