Kees Vernooij wrote: >Again: the fact that DFsort acts differently on the new device could be caused >by CFW. With CFW dfsort could decide to use SORTWKs, without CFW DFSORT could >decide that this is too slow and use memory.
Very true! Will the DFSORT gurus answer on your statement this or next month? ;-D I'm watching this thread, because my own DFSORT + ICETOOL jobs are grabbing and eating everything - CPU, Inits, Memory and DASD space, name it, like there is no tomorrow... ;-D Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
