Non-uniform page datasets is just bad. The smallest will generally drive the allocation of all.
Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Adams, Anne (DTI) > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DFSORT Weirdness > > No, at least one of the page data sets was larger during the initial > migration. > Also, as the page datasets fill up they'll add additional ones of varying > sizes. > > Anne R. Adams > DTI, Systems Engineering > State of Delaware > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jim Mulder > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DFSORT Weirdness > > > Yeah, we've been told to do the same thing, but I need to know why > > this suddenly happened. All we did was move our page data sets to the > DS8800. > > Did the move preserve the number of page data sets, and the size of > the page data sets? Was the total amount of page data set space the > same before and after the move? > > Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
