Thanks, I felt so alone. Like we were the only ones having this problem. Checking into the Cache Fast Write on both the old and new DASD.
Anne R. Adams DTI, Systems Engineering State of Delaware -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: DFSORT Weirdness Kees Vernooij wrote: >Again: the fact that DFsort acts differently on the new device could be caused >by CFW. With CFW dfsort could decide to use SORTWKs, without CFW DFSORT could >decide that this is too slow and use memory. Very true! Will the DFSORT gurus answer on your statement this or next month? ;-D I'm watching this thread, because my own DFSORT + ICETOOL jobs are grabbing and eating everything - CPU, Inits, Memory and DASD space, name it, like there is no tomorrow... ;-D Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
