On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:41:54 +0000, Robert Prins wrote: > >... the advantage of keeping things together, like the PL/I RFE I've >very recently entered, ><https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=147579>. >Feel free to vote for it, although I already expect it to be accepted. > I don't speak PL/I, but wouldn't it be even better to declare an array of structures, each having two fields, ISO and INFO. Initialization could then keep the initial values even closer together.
>And a general note: when using ISPF edit to remove sequence numbers from a >(large) number of (large) members, you might need to cater for the fact that a >PDS might need to be compressed at some stage in the middle of your processing! > Use PDSE. >PS: Please people, strip off all the unnecessary garbage from your replies... > PS: Please, people, set your clock and timezone consistently: TZ=Europe/Vilnius, not GMT. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN