In a separate post, I have said a little more about rounding and alignment cases for program objects.
As to the Astonishment in POLA, I would suggest that astonishment is relative to the experience of the beholder, as illustrated here: SPOCK: Captain, the Intrepid would have done all these things too, and yet they were destroyed. KIRK: Well, they may not have done all of these things. You just pointed out how illogical this situation is. SPOCK: True. It is also true they never knew what was killing them. Their logic would not have permitted them to believe they were being killed. KIRK: Explain. SPOCK: Vulcan has not been conquered within its collective memory. The memory goes back so far that no Vulcan can conceive of a conqueror. I knew the ship was lost because I sensed it. KIRK: What was it you sensed? SPOCK: The touch of death. KIRK: And what do you think they felt? SPOCK: Astonishment. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> wrote on 09/01/2021 09:39:18 AM: > From: "Paul Gilmartin" <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 09/01/2021 01:17 PM > Subject: Re: RENT binder option > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 01:44:44 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: > > > As we have already discussed, program objects do get > >rounded up to 4k multiples. Load modules do not. > > > So for program objects REFRPROT follows POLA. > > ∎ > > Both ends rounded? > > -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
