I don't know what Cf. or ply. mean around my name, but I was just joking
around with someone from IBM who is super helpful here and happens to
have the same name as the guy in the movie.
On 8/30/2021 1:40 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:10:50 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
On a test system, you may specify the undocumented
CsvSP252RoundUp TRAPS name in DIAGxx. For a module
being loaded into subpool 252, that will round the length up to
a 4K multiple.
Document it. What's IBM trying to protect via obscurantism?
(Cf. Tom Brennan's ply.)
What's the harm in specifying CsvSP252RoundUp TRAPS on a
production system? I suspect:
o Squandering a couple slack KiB for each module loaded.
o Possible program checks in poorly implemented vendor products.
Conscientious vendors should be willingly repair those (what
would IBM do?)
o RoundUp is a suspected carcinogen.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
