> RoundUp is a suspected carcinogen. Should have referenced a bug killer rather than a weed killer, no? CsvSP252BlackFlag?
> Document it. What's IBM trying to protect via obscurantism? Not having to document it LOL. I suppose not having to provide it on an ongoing, "upward compatible" basis. Seriously, I agree with @Gil. Wasting a few bytes should be the default, not leaving a few bytes unprotected. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 1:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RENT binder option On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:10:50 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: > > On a test system, you may specify the undocumented >CsvSP252RoundUp TRAPS name in DIAGxx. For a module >being loaded into subpool 252, that will round the length up to >a 4K multiple. > Document it. What's IBM trying to protect via obscurantism? (Cf. Tom Brennan's ply.) What's the harm in specifying CsvSP252RoundUp TRAPS on a production system? I suspect: o Squandering a couple slack KiB for each module loaded. o Possible program checks in poorly implemented vendor products. Conscientious vendors should be willingly repair those (what would IBM do?) o RoundUp is a suspected carcinogen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
