"These are not necessarily unique for z/OS unix work due to the reuse of
the BPXAS initiators. Even if you include the timestamps, they are not
granular enough to give uniqueness."

Well you wouldnt use just those records for BPXAS ... there are others like
74? that are written for BPXAS...

Joe

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:32 PM Andrew Rowley <and...@blackhillsoftware.com>
wrote:

> On 17/09/2021 3:22 am, Joe Monk wrote:
> > I dont understand the problem. On the type 30 record, there are the
> > following fields in the identification section, the location of which can
> > be found in the header (SMF30IOF, SMF30ILN):
> >
> > Offset 0, Length 8 - Job Name
> > Offset 8, Length 8 - Program Name
> > Offset 16, Length 10 - Step Name
> > Offset 32, Length 20 - JES JOB ID
> These are not necessarily unique for z/OS unix work due to the reuse of
> the BPXAS initiators. Even if you include the timestamps, they are not
> granular enough to give uniqueness.
>
> --
> Andrew Rowley
> Black Hill Software
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to