Hi folks,

I am trying to go back to basics a bit and figure out some things that I
have always treated as magic.
Right now it is how a 3270 terminal connected to a z/OS determines the size
of the terminal. In this case through OSA-ICC (zBC12, OSA-Express5) and not
TCPIP,

On systems where I have configured VTAM with TCPIP the terminal size seems
to almost always "just work".
Let's take a look at an example. I have configured X3270 with model
"3279-4-E" and oversize set to "133x60".

1) What does the z/OS VTAM screen look like?
Over OSA-ICC: 80x24
Over TCPIP: 80x24

So far so good.

2) What does the TSO screen look like?
Over OSA-ICC: 80x24
Over TCPIP: 80x24

Ok, no change.

3) What does the ISPF screen look like?
Over OSA-ICC: 80x24
Over TCPIP: 133x60

Oh! But why? I do not know! Also, after I exit ISPF back to TSO, the TSO
screen is now correctly filling the full screen!

I also note that z/VM's login screen seems to behave similarly. Over
OSA-ICC the size seems to be fixed at 80x24, but over TCPIP it follows what
I configured X3270 to use.
Dialing a z/OS VTAM terminal through the z/OS login screen (connected via
TCPIP) seems to result in a 133x60 screen both in TSO and ISPF. However if
I ATTACH an OSA-ICC terminal straight to a z/OS guest, ISPF gets 133x60 but
TSO only 80x24 - *but only if I reconnect to an existing user session.* If
I log out and try to log in again I get IKT00405I "Screen erase caused by
error recovery procedure".

As you can see I am a mess when it comes to understanding how this all fits
together! It seems pretty much random to me, except that TCPIP "almost
always works" and OSA-ICC "almost never works".
I would love to learn more, but I don't even know where to begin.

Regards,

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to