Thanks all, this cleared up some things indeed!

I have now read and experimented, and for my ICC terminal size issue it
seem that with the combined tips above I managed to craft "LOGON
APPLID=TSO,LOGMODE=D4B32784" which makes me able to use a 80x43 terminal in
ISPF at least (and D4B32785 for a 27x132) when autodetection fails.
That is very much appreciated progress. Ideally I would like to
use D4B32XX3 to make use of the dynamic sizing, which I see that my TCPIP
connections use (D NET,SESSIONS,SID=xxx) (or rather, the remote version
D4C32XX3), but if I try to force that LOGMODE I get the earlier mentioned
error IKT00405I "Screen erase caused by error recovery procedure".

That issue however seems to be "working as intended":
SSMVSE11008 Allow OSA-ICC Consoles to have larger than Mod 5 Screen Size
Consoles connected via an OSA-ICC must use 3270 screen sizes 2 (24X80), 3
(32X80), 4 (43X80), or 5 (27X132) while SMCS consoles can use screen sizes
up to 60X132. The OSA-ICC support needs to be updated to allow for larger
screen sizes.
Rejected: OSA-ICC is a stabilized function and is not being enhanced.

It does seem that this was later re-opened and fixed for z13 and newer, so
I guess my poor zBC12 will have to live with this limitation.

Either way, now I understand more!

Regards,

On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:08 PM Farley, Peter x23353 <
[email protected]> wrote:

> If your installation has not disabled or deleted them, IBM standard
> VTAMLST defines a flexible log mode (D4C32XX3) that you can specify in the
> LOGON to VTAM.  I use this in a PCOMM script that I use to login to my
> employer's systems:
>
> logon applid=xxxxxxxx,logmode=D4C32XX3
>
> Where "xxxxxxxx" is my employer's system name.   This allows me to use a
> custom screen size (50x160) from PCOMM.
>
> My ISPF terminal settings are:
>
> Screen format   3       (MAX)
>
> Terminal Type   28      (3278L1 for code page setting 1047 which allows me
> to use "real" EBCDIC square brackets X'AD' and X'BD')
>
> HTH
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 9:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: What determines the effective terminal size?
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> I forgot to mention that OSA-ICC is a TN3270 server that presents the
> appearance of a local non-SNA controller, which means that there is no
> exchange of BIND. What's in the LOGMODE that you're using?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mason.gmu.edu/*smetz3__;fg!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!eyVjdivF1-lcxrN1dYmRRl-p0KULDqDn4ERbh-nY-ht2KWbO-pVz1GnFgv5nDAOVbMe-pQ$
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf
> of Christian Svensson [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 5:07 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: What determines the effective terminal size?
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am trying to go back to basics a bit and figure out some things that I
> have always treated as magic.
> Right now it is how a 3270 terminal connected to a z/OS determines the
> size of the terminal. In this case through OSA-ICC (zBC12, OSA-Express5)
> and not TCPIP,
>
> On systems where I have configured VTAM with TCPIP the terminal size seems
> to almost always "just work".
> Let's take a look at an example. I have configured X3270 with model
> "3279-4-E" and oversize set to "133x60".
>
> 1) What does the z/OS VTAM screen look like?
> Over OSA-ICC: 80x24
> Over TCPIP: 80x24
>
> So far so good.
>
> 2) What does the TSO screen look like?
> Over OSA-ICC: 80x24
> Over TCPIP: 80x24
>
> Ok, no change.
>
> 3) What does the ISPF screen look like?
> Over OSA-ICC: 80x24
> Over TCPIP: 133x60
>
> Oh! But why? I do not know! Also, after I exit ISPF back to TSO, the TSO
> screen is now correctly filling the full screen!
>
> I also note that z/VM's login screen seems to behave similarly. Over
> OSA-ICC the size seems to be fixed at 80x24, but over TCPIP it follows what
> I configured X3270 to use.
> Dialing a z/OS VTAM terminal through the z/OS login screen (connected via
> TCPIP) seems to result in a 133x60 screen both in TSO and ISPF. However if
> I ATTACH an OSA-ICC terminal straight to a z/OS guest, ISPF gets 133x60 but
> TSO only 80x24 - *but only if I reconnect to an existing user session.* If
> I log out and try to log in again I get IKT00405I "Screen erase caused by
> error recovery procedure".
>
> As you can see I am a mess when it comes to understanding how this all
> fits together! It seems pretty much random to me, except that TCPIP "almost
> always works" and OSA-ICC "almost never works".
> I would love to learn more, but I don't even know where to begin.
>
> Regards,
> --
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to