On 1 April 2013 10:03, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > I am now thinking that perhaps I write the "SMF build" logic in the Metal C subset dialect, but then compile it two ways: > > 1. With Metal C for linking with Rexx. > 2. With "standard" C (is there a name for non-metallic C? Plastic C?) for linking with the C++ code.
Probably "LE C" describes it best. But keep in mind that there's effectively a third kind of C: System Programming C. This is the same compiler (and same object output) as LE C, but with a different run-time environment that replaces (some of) LE with minimalist routines that provide basic services. And as with Metal C, there is no SPC++... Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
