Home is where your stuff is, so sounds like a good place to be.
As I said, you seem like you would be a fun guy to work with. Curiosity and
cleverness go a long way.
2023 is a little ways off, so please continue to contribute
to the conversation here!

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:11 PM John McKown <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Forgot to mention,  I'll be 70 & I'm not in good health (dialysis), so I'm
> retiring and just going to stay home (gaming) or go on short weekend trips
> in the car. I will most likely resign from all email groups.
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022, 16:12 Usher, Darrold <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > z/OS v2.4 appears to really enforce LE compliance especially for any
> > called utility routines will need to be LE compliant or you could end up
> > with a U4088-63 abend. Generally, straightforward old COBOL code will
> > continue to run on newer LE versions with some exceptions. It would nice
> to
> > keep the old environment around at least until you can determine whether
> > the apps that will remain can run on z/OS v2.4.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf
> > Of Steve Horein
> > Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 4:02 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Running z/OS 1.12 apps on 2.4
> >
> > Where are you going after that?
> > You seem like you would be a fun guy to work with.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 1:22 PM John McKown <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > My current employer is still running stuff on z/OS 1.12 on a z10BC.
> > > They are shutting it down. But they have mentioned an "archive
> solution"
> > for ???
> > > apps which might not make the "hard" decommission date.
> > >
> > > Their latest idea is basically outsourcing to an "on demand" service.
> > > It is running 2.4 . I am curious if they might run into problem with
> > > old COBOL code with the new LE. It's just curiosity because I will not
> > > be involved, supposedly. I am not sure about EasyTrieve Plus either.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any thoughts. My actual work for them will end, supposedly
> > > end 1Q23, but my employment & pay will last until 1Aug23, regardless
> > > (a kind of severance).
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email
> > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to