On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:41:38 +0100, Colin Paice <[email protected]> wrote:
>[email protected] is the right address for z/OS products. They are not >very good at replying or acknowledging. >Colin > >On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 16:31, Farley, Peter < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there a different documentation error / omission address then this one >> for IBM manuals? >> >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> >> I sent one to that address on April 4 and have yet to receive any reply, >> not even an acknowledgement that the email was received. >> >> Peter >> >> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. >> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized >> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >> e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. >> > hi, I have learned through internal contacts that the documentation team does not provide a direct response to documentation feedback. All comments are received, sent to the appropriate party and evaluated to help improve the content experience. Any updates to the product documentation are then reflected in the current release of the product. Hope this helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
