Classification: Confidential

I believe so. 
ISTR that you needed to submit a job with a proc that did not exist to force 
JES to reopen all the proclib concats and update the control block.

As another poster suggested, I would remove the proclibs from JES and use 
JCLLIB instead.

HTH,

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
rpinion865
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 8:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PDS compress and PROCLIB

[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the 
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, 
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]

I just tested this scenario on a z/OS 2.5 system.  I even went so far as to 
reallocate the proclib on a different volume.  Unfortunately, the proclib I 
picked was one allocated to MSTJCL.  I got S213 abends when trying to issue a 
start for anything.  I put it back on the original volume, and all was good.

I wonder if I had picked another proclib that was not in MSTJCL, if moving to a 
new volume would have worked.  I might try that later today.




Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 at 9:10 AM, Allan Staller 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Classification: Confidential
>
> Re delete/reallocate is true. Jes closes the proclibs between uses
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [email protected] On Behalf 
> Of rpinion865
>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 7:43 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PDS compress and PROCLIB
>
> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you 
> trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a 
> Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your 
> Computer.]
>
> Urban legend or false memory. But in the early 1980s, I was told that if you 
> started a proc that did not exist, JES2 would open and close each proclib in 
> the concatenation. In fact, I was told, and if I remember correctly, I was 
> able to backup a proclib that ran out of directory blocks, delete the 
> library, re-allocate the library, restore the library, issue a start on a 
> non-existent proc, and all was good.
>
>
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 at 8:12 AM, Lennie Bradshaw 
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > As far as I know JES2 holds proclibs open normally. There may be a way to 
> > get it to close and re-open them.
> > JES2 runs with the NDSI bit set in the PPT. Hence it does not issue ENQs 
> > for any datasets it allocates.
> > Lennie
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [email protected] On 
> > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> >
> > Sent: 12 June 2024 12:59
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: PDS compress and PROCLIB
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 08:55:56 +0000, Lennie Bradshaw wrote:
> >
> > > I believe JES2 read the proclibs without data integrity (i.e. no ENQs are 
> > > issued for the libraries). ...
> >
> > Why!? Is PDSE a solution? IEB COPY with DISP=SHR?
> >
> > We had a developer-facing local PROCLIB catenand. I routinely updated a 
> > member in background using ISPF EDIT ENQs.
> > Once I found another developer's content in "my" member. She had 
> > courteously signed it. She explained that she had updated her member from a 
> > test system sharing DASD. Admin explained that MIM had crashed on that 
> > system at that time.
> >
> > MIM isn't fail-safe. But the price of fail-safe might be inability to IPL 
> > before MIM activates.
> >
> > --
> > gil
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
> > IBM-MAIN
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
> > IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> ::DISCLAIMER::
> ________________________________
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and 
> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not 
> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses 
> in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred 
> errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or 
> its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely 
> those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of 
> HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, 
> disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message 
> without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete 
> it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or 
> attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects.
> ________________________________
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to