The BUFCB has to be below the line. Not "the buffer addresses." I am actually using it with buffers above the line, so this is not a theoretical conjecture.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Godfrey Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 6:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Examples of getbuf and build usage Look one line above that. This is copied from one of your earlier posts: + ICM 14,7,21(1) LOAD BUFCB ADDRESS Bill On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:28:07 -0400, Charles Mills wrote: >Nope. > >+ ICM R2,B'1111',0(14) IS A BUFFER AVAILABLE >+ BZ *+10 NO,RETURN ZERO >+ MVC 0(4,14),0(R2) > >Charles >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] >On Behalf Of Bill Godfrey >Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2013 9:30 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Examples of getbuf and build usage > >On Thu, 30 May 2013 19:12:54 -0400, Micheal Butz wrote: > >>Would anyone have examples of >>Getbuf used with BSAM read >> >>I think it might help my problem >> >Are your buffer addresses above the line? If so, they shouldn't be. GETBUF >gets a 24-bit BUFCB address from the DCB using ICM 14,7,21(1). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
