Then it's a good thing that nobody ever suggested that. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Jon Perryman <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 4:12 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of an S-con for a long displacement? External Message: Use Caution On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 00:54:20 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >But those risks aren't any worse with S-cons. > >As for time tested, isn't half a century long enough? R0 & R1 are time tested in professional products. R1 pointing to SCONs using the caller's registers, never. To ignore the risks does not mean the risks don't exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
