In
<985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c23194bd...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com>,
on 06/10/2013
at 02:46 PM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[email protected]>
said:
>There *are* non-theoretical solutions to "runaway" file output. The
>*ix system model of using "disk quotas" per "user" makes it entirely
>possible to imagine z/OS "application" users with "reasonable" disk
>quotas specific to the application (i.e., not by job but by suite of
>jobs).
Mommy, make it go away. An out of control job would kill unrelated
work. Per file quotas might be workable, but would lead to the same
types of outcry as space specification: "I don't know how much output
the job will create."
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
