In <[email protected]>, on 06/10/2013
at 01:16 PM, Gerhard Postpischil <[email protected]> said:
>Technically the easiest to implement would be adding a new device
>type, thus keeping (E)CKD completely distinct from FBA. The new type
>could be supported by VSAM/AMS only (and JCL, SVC 99, etc.) without
>impacting other programs. (I would hope there are no programs out
>there using TM UCBTBYT3 rather than CLI?)
If IBM could implement a VSAM ESDS reverse compatibility interface
(RCI) for other systems, why not for MVS?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
