Why did you drop HJVA800 and HJVB800 from the SELECT? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Radoslaw Skorupka <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 11:15 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SMP/E APPLY mystery External Message: Use Caution More information V1: ========= APPLY BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM) SELECT ( HBY3202 HJVA800 HJVB800 ) . BATCH EMULATOR JOB(BDO31012) STEP(APPLY ) PGM= HEWLH096 IEW2322I 1220 89 ENTRY BAZGPSAC IEW2322I 1220 90 MODE AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY) IEW2322I 1220 91 INCLUDE SMP00001(BAZGPSAC) HBY3202 SEQ # 000021 IEW2322I 1220 92 NAME BAZGPSAC(R) MAX ACCEPTABLE RC=04 IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSAC CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZCHCK CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSTE CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSEF CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSFJ CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSCD CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSCA CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR SECTION BAZGPSOP CLASS B_TEXT. IEW2651W 511C ESD AMODE 24 CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED AMODE 31 FOR ENTRY POINT BAZGPSAC. V2: ========= APPLY BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM) SELECT (HBY3202 UA36703 UA40327 UW27442 UW29050 UW29115 UW32877 UW35111 UW37410 UW41183 UW44700 UW71279 UW95965 ) . BATCH EMULATOR JOB(BHP24021) STEP(APPLY ) PGM= HEWLH096 IEW2322I 1220 152 ENTRY BAZGPSAC IEW2322I 1220 153 MODE AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY) IEW2322I 1220 154 INCLUDE SMPWRK3(BAZGPSAC) UW95965 SEQ # 000006 IEW2322I 1220 155 SETSSI 01115965 IEW2322I 1220 156 NAME BAZGPSAC(R) MAX ACCEPTABLE RC=08 IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL BAZCHCK UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) SPECIFIED. IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL BAZGPSTE UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) SPECIFIED. IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL BAZGPSEF UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) SPECIFIED. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 11.12.2025 o 13:36, Seymour J Metz pisze: > Not enough information. What were the APPLY statements and what were the > messages? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List<[email protected]> on behalf of > Radoslaw Skorupka<[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 5:23 AM > To:[email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: SMP/E APPLY mystery > > > External Message: Use Caution > > > The following scenario: > Old product HBY3202 (JES/328x) is being installed from CBPDO. > Variant 1 - only FMID is selected for APPLY, no PTFs. Then (next job) > PTFs are applied. > Variant 2 - FMID and PTFs are selected for APPLY in one command. > > Same FMID, same set of PTFs, but results are different - load module > created in V1 consist of few MODs, while second case causes to not link > several modules and resulting LMOD is smaller. > Many LMODs are affected. > > No differences in NCAL option and any other link-editor related ones. > Same (untouched) MCS statements. > > Any clue? > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
