It is not related to the problem. Both FMIDs are Java, which means it is unrelated to JES/328x. I also tried to APPLY single FMID, same result, however I don't have all the outputs from all trials performed.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland



W dniu 11.12.2025 o 17:22, Seymour J Metz pisze:
Why did you drop HJVA800 and HJVB800 from the SELECT?

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List<[email protected]> on behalf of Radoslaw 
Skorupka<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 11:15 AM
To:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SMP/E APPLY mystery


External Message: Use Caution


More information

V1:
=========
APPLY BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)
       SELECT (
               HBY3202
               HJVA800
               HJVB800
              ) .


BATCH EMULATOR  JOB(BDO31012) STEP(APPLY   ) PGM= HEWLH096
IEW2322I 1220  89    ENTRY BAZGPSAC
IEW2322I 1220  90    MODE AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY)
IEW2322I 1220  91    INCLUDE SMP00001(BAZGPSAC)             HBY3202
   SEQ # 000021
IEW2322I 1220  92    NAME BAZGPSAC(R)                       MAX
ACCEPTABLE RC=04
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSAC CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZCHCK CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSTE CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSEF CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSFJ CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSCD CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSCA CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2646W 4B07 ESD RMODE(24) CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED RMODE(ANY) FOR
SECTION BAZGPSOP CLASS B_TEXT.
IEW2651W 511C ESD AMODE 24 CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED AMODE 31 FOR
ENTRY POINT BAZGPSAC.



V2:
=========

APPLY       BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)
       SELECT (HBY3202
               UA36703
               UA40327
               UW27442
               UW29050
               UW29115
               UW32877
               UW35111
               UW37410
               UW41183
               UW44700
               UW71279
               UW95965
              ) .

BATCH EMULATOR  JOB(BHP24021) STEP(APPLY   ) PGM= HEWLH096
IEW2322I 1220  152    ENTRY BAZGPSAC
IEW2322I 1220  153    MODE AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY)
IEW2322I 1220  154    INCLUDE SMPWRK3(BAZGPSAC) UW95965       SEQ # 000006
IEW2322I 1220  155     SETSSI 01115965
IEW2322I 1220  156    NAME BAZGPSAC(R)                       MAX
ACCEPTABLE RC=08
IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL BAZCHCK UNRESOLVED.  NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) SPECIFIED.
IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL BAZGPSTE UNRESOLVED.  NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) SPECIFIED.
IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL BAZGPSEF UNRESOLVED.  NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) SPECIFIED.



--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland















W dniu 11.12.2025 o 13:36, Seymour J Metz pisze:
Not enough information. What were the APPLY statements and what were the 
messages?

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List<[email protected]> on behalf of Radoslaw 
Skorupka<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 5:23 AM
To:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: SMP/E APPLY mystery


External Message: Use Caution


The following scenario:
Old product HBY3202 (JES/328x) is being installed from CBPDO.
Variant 1 - only FMID is selected for APPLY, no PTFs. Then (next job)
PTFs are applied.
Variant 2 - FMID and PTFs are selected for APPLY in one command.

Same FMID, same set of PTFs, but results are different - load module
created in V1 consist of few MODs, while second case causes to not link
several modules and resulting LMOD is smaller.
Many LMODs are affected.

No differences in NCAL option and any other link-editor related ones.
Same (untouched) MCS statements.

Any clue?

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to