On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 15:47:23 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka <[email protected]> wrote:
>W dniu 12.12.2025 o 16:03, Rebecca Martin pisze: >> Is there a reason why you want to specify the specific PTFs? Why not do >> APPLY CHECK FORFMID(HBY3202) GROUPEXTEND > >It is unrelated to the issue. I agree with Radoslaw. He identified a packaging bug where applying each PTF creates a different load module versus applying all PTFs at the same time. The load module size is different by thousands of bytes. Using SMP/e, a load module is required (not enforced) to be the same size at the same PTF level. In the following SMP/e output apply for UW95965, we don't see the expected include and replace statements. This tells us the UW96965 completely replaces BAZGPSAC and the only way the load module could be different sizes would be from a PTF & FMID packaging error. Because of this PTF packaging error, we can't tell which is the correct method to apply PTFs. IEW2322I 1220 152 ENTRY BAZGPSAC IEW2322I 1220 153 MODE AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY) IEW2322I 1220 154 INCLUDE SMPWRK3(BAZGPSAC) UW95965 SEQ # 000006 IEW2322I 1220 155 SETSSI 01115965 IEW2322I 1220 156 NAME BAZGPSAC(R) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
