Working most of these..RPG was a bit of challenge ..easytrieve wasn't too , but 
I have In SAS..now MarkIV, haven't heard of that one. I also learned Assembler, 
Cobol and the PL/1 ...like several of the guys I liked PL/1 ...

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


On Jul 4, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Tony Babonas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wow!  Never heard of the language but I'm envious.
> 
> On 7/4/2013 5:59 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>> Mark IV had a ruler too...
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Anthony Babonas <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Rising to the defense of RPG, what other language had its own ruler? Talk 
>>> about ease of coding! Ah the nostalgia.....sigh.
>>> 
>>> Sent from Tony's iPhone.
>>> 
>>> On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:50 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've not run across many languages that I considered "ugly". RPG II was
>>>> one. EasyTrieve Plus is not "ugly", but I don't much like it. The newest
>>>> IBM COBOL is rather nice, albeit still wordy. The first COBOL that I
>>>> learned: ANSI COBOL back in the 1970s made me puke, after learning PL/I of
>>>> the same era.
>>>> 
>>>> The main thing that I hate is a manager saying "use xyz, but refrain from
>>>> using the new omega facilities". The reason being that everybody in the
>>>> shop knows the basic xyz language, but is not familiar with the omega
>>>> features. So I am chained down to the least common denominator for "ease of
>>>> understanding" by those who simply won't learn new stuff. Case in point in
>>>> my current shop, at least in the past, was not using any z/OS UNIX
>>>> facilities because they were "just too esoteric and complicated".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> In
>>>>> <CAAJSdjg1jRs6DrNV7xzAftEoGcojyeGf=fvwkbdh_idvozp...@mail.gmail.com>,
>>>>> on 07/03/2013
>>>>>   at 07:10 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.itworld.com/it-management/363424/only-thing-programmers-have-fear-all-these-things
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I say "yes" to most. #4 is being forced to learn or use some specific
>>>>>> technology
>>>>> 
>>>>> What if you consider a language to be ugly but also consider it to be
>>>>> the best tool for the job? I don't care for Perl syntax, but between
>>>>> the expressive power of the language and the modules available in
>>>>> CPAN, I find myself using it regardless. That's not a boss telling me
>>>>> that I have to - it's my own decision.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>>     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>>>>>     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
>>>>> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
>>>>> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an
>>>> actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you?
>>>> 
>>>> Maranatha! <><
>>>> John McKown
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to