On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:46:13 +0100, Martin Packer wrote: >Doesn't SMF 14 / 15 help you here? Probably 15 as it's SORTWK etc. The >problem will be identifying the actual sort work DD statement names. Maybe >30 can also do it - assuming it marks a DD as tape. > And assuming that the job in question has been run within the SMF retention interval.
>From: Roger Steyn >Date: 09/03/2013 09:41 AM > > ... I did some research on this and found 3 conditions to >be satisfied in order to user tape sort feature > >a) SORTLIB DD statement in their JCL > >b) SYNCTAPE library in the linklist - (Which i already found to be there ) > >c) SORTWRK DD statements will have UNIT=TAPE > And assuming that the data sets are not dynamically allocated, so the DD statements appear in JCL. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
