In
<offafe5c57.5a2683f5-on48257be3.002c050c-48257be3.00333...@sg.ibm.com>,
on 09/11/2013
at 05:17 PM, Timothy Sipples <[email protected]> said:
>By the way, I'm rather tired of the implicit and explicit
>criticisms that Server Time Protocol (STP) has a separate charge.
The criticism is *not* that STP has a separate charge, but rather that
the automated setting of the time *ON A SINGLE BOX* requires STP,
which is chargeable. I don't recall anybody complaining that
sub-millisecond synchronization between boxes should be free.
>do you really want IBM to implement lower quality time services on
>zEnterprise?
As a free *option*? In a heartbeat. As the *only* option? Nobody has
asked for that. What they have asked for is the ability for a single
box to use NTP without paying extra for it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
