In
<of811b14da.8838eb3f-on48257be4.0035cc4f-48257be4.00386...@sg.ibm.com>,
on 09/12/2013
at 06:14 PM, Timothy Sipples <[email protected]> said:
>OK, so that's where you'd like to draw the "no additional
>charge"/"separately chargeable" line.
I can see several possibilities. In order of preference:
1. Using NTP to set the TOD forward by a small amount.
2. Using NTP to set a virtual TOD forward by a small amount.
3. Using NTP to set the TOD at the next POR.
Note that I am not suggesting the ability to set the TOD backwards,
nor do I consider it desirable to use clock steering to correct major
discrepancies unless an IPL is totally unacceptable.
Have their been any discussions at Share about this issue? I assume
that it's only the small shops that would be interested; the large
ones presumably need STP due to multi-CEC configurations.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
