I would like to know more detail on what you are trying to accomplish. >From previous posts you wanted to move your product libraries off of your sysres. Is this part of that plan?
If so, you may be making a very complicated environment. So, could you provide some insight to the following Will all LPARs be unique? They will not share dasd or datasets? That includes JES2 spool? Or are you setting up unique LPARs that will will be in MONOPLEX? Or are you going to do a SYSPLEX? I find sometimes it is easier to have a Usercat for my product libraries that are shared in grouped (Sysplex) environment. Could you tell us what your goals are with these questions about APF, moving Product libraries off the SYSRES and what your environment is in general? Sysplex or Monoplex? We will give you lots of answers but they may not apply equally to what you are trying to accomplish. I like using IEASYMxx member that uses different symbolics based on the IPL/LPAR name. So you can code each LPAR in the IEASYMxx member and put a different answer to that same symbolic. Maybe something along that line might be easier? I worked in one shop where all of my LPARs were sharing all of the DASD but they were different sysplex names. So I determined it would be easier to use SYMBOLICRELATE function and IEASYMxx to have unique dataset names that resided in a Usercat. Maybe something like that would be easier for your requirements? Lizette -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of baby eklavya Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 3:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: No XCFAS ENQ seen on a LNKLST dataset - Confusing ! Yes..But this is a pure production system and am sure that no such commands were issued since the last IPL . That's why am confused ! On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]>wrote: > On 10/5/2013 2:53 PM, baby eklavya wrote: > >> Am curious how that can happen . Is there a way an XCFAS ENQ can be >> eliminated while having those datasets in the linklist .We are on >> Z/os >> 1.11 >> running 4 lpars sharing the same LNKLST set for all the LPARS . >> Please share your thoughts on this >> > > SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE > SETPROG LNKLST,ALLOCATE > > -- > Edward E Jaffe > Phoenix Software International, Inc > 831 Parkview Drive North > El Segundo, CA 90245 > http://www.phoenixsoftware.**com/ <http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
