*command was picked up with the IPL
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:27 AM, baby eklavya <[email protected]> wrote: > We found the problem . Prior to the last IPL , a 'SETPROG > LNKLST,UNALLOCATE' was added to the automation startup script and the > command was IPL'ed and nobody was aware of it ... > > Thanks for all the help ! > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Jake anderson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> If you are part of IBM, then you get more answer within your Group >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:32 AM, baby eklavya <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hello Lizette , >>> >>> I apologize for the confusion . Actually , we support multiple customers >>> and i should have told that first . >>> >>> The plan of moving product libraries off my sysres is on a completely >>> different environment and the question of missing XCFAS ENQ is for a >>> different client system . Both are totally different environments .Your >>> suggestion of using the IEASYMxx is exactly what we are planning to >>> implement there . At the moment , plan of moving the product datasets off >>> sysres is on HOLD , and i would resume that work again after a couple of >>> weeks . I will post the progress of that work on the other thread . >>> >>> >>> Now coming back to XCFAS ENQ , Here , we are running a parallel sysplex >>> environment with 4 LPARS and all share the same DASD's . Today i >>> accidentally tried to rename a dataset which was in Linklist . Then from >>> ISPF , i found that its held by LLA and i didnt find an XCFAS ENQ there . >>> Then i checked other datasets in the linklist , and it turned out as "No >>> XCFAS ENQ for any of them" >>> >>> I was wondering how that could happen . Being a production LPAR , i don't >>> believe anybody would have tried a SETPROG UNALLOCATE . >>> >>> Could this have something to do with GRS setup ? >>> >>> Once again , I want to thank you for your support and really appreciate >>> the >>> way you help me all the time :) >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Baby >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > I would like to know more detail on what you are trying to accomplish. >>> > >>> > From previous posts you wanted to move your product libraries off of >>> your >>> > sysres. Is this part of that plan? >>> > >>> > If so, you may be making a very complicated environment. >>> > >>> > So, could you provide some insight to the following >>> > >>> > Will all LPARs be unique? They will not share dasd or datasets? That >>> > includes JES2 spool? Or are you setting up unique LPARs that will >>> will be >>> > in MONOPLEX? Or are you going to do a SYSPLEX? >>> > >>> > I find sometimes it is easier to have a Usercat for my product >>> libraries >>> > that are shared in grouped (Sysplex) environment. >>> > >>> > Could you tell us what your goals are with these questions about APF, >>> > moving >>> > Product libraries off the SYSRES and what your environment is in >>> general? >>> > Sysplex or Monoplex? >>> > >>> > >>> > We will give you lots of answers but they may not apply equally to >>> what you >>> > are trying to accomplish. >>> > >>> > I like using IEASYMxx member that uses different symbolics based on the >>> > IPL/LPAR name. So you can code each LPAR in the IEASYMxx member and >>> put a >>> > different answer to that same symbolic. Maybe something along that >>> line >>> > might be easier? >>> > >>> > I worked in one shop where all of my LPARs were sharing all of the >>> DASD but >>> > they were different sysplex names. So I determined it would be easier >>> to >>> > use SYMBOLICRELATE function and IEASYMxx to have unique dataset names >>> that >>> > resided in a Usercat. Maybe something like that would be easier for >>> your >>> > requirements? >>> > >>> > >>> > Lizette >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On >>> > Behalf Of baby eklavya >>> > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 3:05 PM >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Subject: Re: No XCFAS ENQ seen on a LNKLST dataset - Confusing ! >>> > >>> > Yes..But this is a pure production system and am sure that no such >>> commands >>> > were issued since the last IPL . >>> > >>> > That's why am confused ! >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected] >>> > >wrote: >>> > >>> > > On 10/5/2013 2:53 PM, baby eklavya wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Am curious how that can happen . Is there a way an XCFAS ENQ can be >>> > >> eliminated while having those datasets in the linklist .We are on >>> > >> Z/os >>> > >> 1.11 >>> > >> running 4 lpars sharing the same LNKLST set for all the LPARS . >>> > >> Please share your thoughts on this >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE >>> > > SETPROG LNKLST,ALLOCATE >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Edward E Jaffe >>> > > Phoenix Software International, Inc >>> > > 831 Parkview Drive North >>> > > El Segundo, CA 90245 >>> > > http://www.phoenixsoftware.**com/ <http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/> >>> > > >>> > >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> > >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
