We found the problem . Prior to the last IPL , a 'SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE' was added to the automation startup script and the command was IPL'ed and nobody was aware of it ...
Thanks for all the help ! On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Jake anderson <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > > If you are part of IBM, then you get more answer within your Group > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:32 AM, baby eklavya <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello Lizette , >> >> I apologize for the confusion . Actually , we support multiple customers >> and i should have told that first . >> >> The plan of moving product libraries off my sysres is on a completely >> different environment and the question of missing XCFAS ENQ is for a >> different client system . Both are totally different environments .Your >> suggestion of using the IEASYMxx is exactly what we are planning to >> implement there . At the moment , plan of moving the product datasets off >> sysres is on HOLD , and i would resume that work again after a couple of >> weeks . I will post the progress of that work on the other thread . >> >> >> Now coming back to XCFAS ENQ , Here , we are running a parallel sysplex >> environment with 4 LPARS and all share the same DASD's . Today i >> accidentally tried to rename a dataset which was in Linklist . Then from >> ISPF , i found that its held by LLA and i didnt find an XCFAS ENQ there . >> Then i checked other datasets in the linklist , and it turned out as "No >> XCFAS ENQ for any of them" >> >> I was wondering how that could happen . Being a production LPAR , i don't >> believe anybody would have tried a SETPROG UNALLOCATE . >> >> Could this have something to do with GRS setup ? >> >> Once again , I want to thank you for your support and really appreciate >> the >> way you help me all the time :) >> >> >> Regards, >> Baby >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > I would like to know more detail on what you are trying to accomplish. >> > >> > From previous posts you wanted to move your product libraries off of >> your >> > sysres. Is this part of that plan? >> > >> > If so, you may be making a very complicated environment. >> > >> > So, could you provide some insight to the following >> > >> > Will all LPARs be unique? They will not share dasd or datasets? That >> > includes JES2 spool? Or are you setting up unique LPARs that will will >> be >> > in MONOPLEX? Or are you going to do a SYSPLEX? >> > >> > I find sometimes it is easier to have a Usercat for my product libraries >> > that are shared in grouped (Sysplex) environment. >> > >> > Could you tell us what your goals are with these questions about APF, >> > moving >> > Product libraries off the SYSRES and what your environment is in >> general? >> > Sysplex or Monoplex? >> > >> > >> > We will give you lots of answers but they may not apply equally to what >> you >> > are trying to accomplish. >> > >> > I like using IEASYMxx member that uses different symbolics based on the >> > IPL/LPAR name. So you can code each LPAR in the IEASYMxx member and >> put a >> > different answer to that same symbolic. Maybe something along that line >> > might be easier? >> > >> > I worked in one shop where all of my LPARs were sharing all of the DASD >> but >> > they were different sysplex names. So I determined it would be easier >> to >> > use SYMBOLICRELATE function and IEASYMxx to have unique dataset names >> that >> > resided in a Usercat. Maybe something like that would be easier for >> your >> > requirements? >> > >> > >> > Lizette >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] >> On >> > Behalf Of baby eklavya >> > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 3:05 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: No XCFAS ENQ seen on a LNKLST dataset - Confusing ! >> > >> > Yes..But this is a pure production system and am sure that no such >> commands >> > were issued since the last IPL . >> > >> > That's why am confused ! >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected] >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > On 10/5/2013 2:53 PM, baby eklavya wrote: >> > > >> > >> Am curious how that can happen . Is there a way an XCFAS ENQ can be >> > >> eliminated while having those datasets in the linklist .We are on >> > >> Z/os >> > >> 1.11 >> > >> running 4 lpars sharing the same LNKLST set for all the LPARS . >> > >> Please share your thoughts on this >> > >> >> > > >> > > SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE >> > > SETPROG LNKLST,ALLOCATE >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Edward E Jaffe >> > > Phoenix Software International, Inc >> > > 831 Parkview Drive North >> > > El Segundo, CA 90245 >> > > http://www.phoenixsoftware.**com/ <http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/> >> > > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
