One of our CEC's with the ICF is going off lease and we're looking at options for not enabling a ICF CP on the replacement CEC.

Mark Jacobs

On 10/14/13 16:25, Bernard, Michael J wrote:
Hello Mark,
Just curious as to what the drivers are behind changing your configuration from a 
balanced one between two CFs vs. keeping everything in one and failing everything over to 
2nd CF if/when necessary.  Is it strictly performance related?? Curious because we have 
been running in a "balanced" 2 CF environment for many years.

Thank you,

Mike Bernard | z/OS Engineer Team Lead | GTI ECS Enterprise Software 
Engineering (ESE) or Extreme Software Engineering
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. | 1111 Polaris Pkwy, Columbus, OH 43240, US | Office:  
614-213-5768 | Cell/pager:  614-406-1045 | Fax: 614-213-4171
(michael.j.bern...@jpmchase.com)


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Coupling Facility Structure Duplexing

We're currently running two CF lpars, with about 1/2 of the structures in each 
CF, and where appropriate we're already duplexing selected structures.

So, my question really is, is the CPU time needed to manage the duplexed 
structure the same as, greater than, or less than the amount of time needed for 
the primary structure? To make the question even harder, I'm not asking about 
zOS CPU time, but ICF CPU time.

Mark Jacobs

On 10/11/13 14:56, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:21:47 -0400, Mark Jacobs <mark.jac...@custserv.com> 
wrote:

We're looking into moving to have all of our structures reside in a
single coupling facility lpar, but have a second one configured as a
hot standby, and as a target to move structures to when a planned
outage of the primary CF is necessary.

I know the answer is "It depends", but does anyone have an WAG on the
CPU usage for the second CF lpar if we use it for structure duplexing
only during normal operations.

(disclaimer...  I have no real world experience / measurements to go from
   - hopefully someone who is duplexing will answer or Mark Brooks).

If you duplexed 100% of the structures, my SWAG would be that the CPU
usage for the 2nd CF would be the same as the primary CF, but that CPU
usage would of course increase due to the overhead / coordination of
duplexing.

An installation guide to duplexing rebuild:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2f1c2/4.
3?SHELF=all13be9&DT=20120814144655

I assume you really wouldn't do "all" structures.

Deciding whether to duplex a structure:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2f1c2/4.
3.2?SHELF=all13be9&DT=20120814144655

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:m...@mzelden.com ITIL v3 Foundation Certified Mark's MVS
Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at
http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
----

The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe...
The loud ones only take the credit.

Londo Mollari - Babylon 5

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an 
official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other 
information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to 
change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily 
reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.

This transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, 
confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance 
thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are 
believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer 
system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the 
recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by 
JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any 
loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission 
in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its 
entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.

Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures 
relating to European legal entities.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
----

The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe...
The loud ones only take the credit.

Londo Mollari - Babylon 5

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to