Why new? A mod entry can be called same as LMOD entry, and these days there are entry types almost for anything.
ITschak On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com>wrote: > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:44:12 +0200, Itschak Mugzach wrote: > > >Use different types and you can have tens of "same names" elements. > > > I believe that's somewhat new; perhaps newer than Phil's experience, > so don't fault him. > > >On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Phil Smith wrote: > > > >> I have a load module that contains a WXTRN reference. If the WXTRN > >> resolves, it gets called to do specialized processing in some > specialized > >> environments; the goal was to maximize code reuse. > >> > >> I need to generate both versions of the load module via SMP/E. Will that > >> work? So the APPLY step needs to point to a different SYSLMOD DD for > that > >> second link, I assume, but are there other "gotchas" here? ISTR being > >> surprised that I couldn't have BANANA (assembler source deck member) and > >> BANANA (macro) in the same SMP/E, um, thingy (CSI?), even though they > were > >> in different libraries. But since this is output, not input, I'm hoping > >> it's possible. > >> > I believe the load module names must be unique, even if they are in > different > SYSLMODs. But I don't believe aliases are so constrained. Would using > a meaningless name with an ALIAS to the name you use work for you? > (You might need to provide ENTRY statements for both names.) > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
